Received: from cheers by mail4.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom)
id FAA26774; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 05:26:19 -0700
Received: from netcom.com by cheers via UUCP (950215.SGI.8.6.10/940406.SGI.AUTO)
for owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com id HAA12573; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 07:29:22 -0500
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 1995 07:29:22 -0500
From: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Message-Id: <199504221229.HAA12573@cheers>
Apparently-To: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
***** UNDELIVERABLE MAIL sent to kurt, being returned by cheers!kurt *****
mail: Error # 2 'Problem with mailfile' encountered on system cheers
Received: from ted by cheers via ESMTP (950215.SGI.8.6.10/940406.SGI.AUTO)
for <kurt@cheers.jsc.nasa.gov> id HAA12566; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 07:29:18 -0500
Received: from netcom2.netcom.com by ted via ESMTP (950215.SGI.8.6.10/940406.SGI.AUTO)
for <kurt@ted.jsc.nasa.gov> id HAA20110; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 07:29:11 -0500
Received: by netcom2.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom)
id KAA00747; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 10:43:47 -0700
Received: from comoro.yorku.ca by netcom2.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom)
id KAA00736; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 10:43:41 -0700
From: ZHUNT@Calumet.Yorku.Ca
Received: from CALUMET.YORKU.CA (asimov.calumet.yorku.ca [130.63.231.100]) by comoro.yorku.ca (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id NAA63108 for <lightwave-l@netcom.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 13:43:49 -0400
Received: from ASIMOV-CALUMET/MERCURYMAIL by CALUMET.YORKU.CA (Mercury 1.21);
21 Apr 95 13:43:48 -500
Received: from MERCURYMAIL by ASIMOV-CALUMET (Mercury 1.21); 21 Apr 95 13:43:41 -500
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Organization: Calumet College, York University
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 13:43:38 -500
Subject: Re: Yet another suggestion needed...
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail/Mac v2.0.5
Message-ID: <D2644754E2@CALUMET.YORKU.CA>
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
>From: Jeric@cup.portal.com
>To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
>Subject: Re: Yet another suggestion needed...
>Date: Thu, 20 Apr 95 03:22:31 PDT
>
>Mark Thompson writes:
>
> >> > For right now there is the option of using LW
> >> > foreground color thresholds (upper and lower).
> >
> >This is pretty terrible for blue screen work. Its only really suitable
>for
> >working with digitally created or hand painted composites.
>
I'm on the ImageFX mailing list, you might want to send mail to
Kermit@cup.portal.com and explain what you want to do, a few days back there
where some messages about ImageFX 2.1 (beta) which seems to have some good